This article is part of our Collette Calls series.
Looking into what is wrong with a consensus first-round pick who is hitting .204/.325/.370 nearly 200 plate appearances into the season is something that everyone will want to read about and a topic that can lead to a 1,500 word count before I know it.
I want to preface this piece with a hypothesis of what is likely wrong with Goldschmidt as it was a topic of conversation during the lunch above with Jeff. We both agreed on the belief that
Looking into what is wrong with a consensus first-round pick who is hitting .204/.325/.370 nearly 200 plate appearances into the season is something that everyone will want to read about and a topic that can lead to a 1,500 word count before I know it.
I want to preface this piece with a hypothesis of what is likely wrong with Goldschmidt as it was a topic of conversation during the lunch above with Jeff. We both agreed on the belief that the humidor is in his head. Every word you have read to this point has been done before I have looked into any stat beyond looking up his triple-slash line. This was done to remove any potential bias as this piece comes together.
Hypothesis: Paul Goldschmidt is not hiding an injury. His poor statistical performance to date is due to the fact the humidor is in his head.
Over the past six seasons, Goldschmidt has been a fantasy cornerstone type player. You invest a top draft pick around him because, save the 2014 season, he has a tremendous track record of health and production. Even that 2014 season was amazing at the plate before the fractured hand injury due to an errant Ernesto Frieri fastball.
PA | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG | BABIP | wOBA | wRC+ |
3841 | 14 | 22 | .301 | .402 | .534 | .355 | .395 | 146 |
2017 was not a career season for Goldschmidt, but he was a counting category monster and was the fourth-highest dollar earner in standard mixed league formats last season behind only Giancarlo Stanton, Charlie Blackmon and Aaron Judge. That is what makes 2018 so depressing to date as Goldschmidt has earned $1 of production this year in that same format, equal to the likes of Miguel Rojas, Adrian Gonzalez and Niko Goodrum.
As we compare 2018 to the previous six seasons, there is one particular area that stands out from the rest: his strikeout rate.
SPLIT | PA | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG | BABIP | wOBA | wRC+ |
Last 6 | 3841 | 14 | 22 | .301 | .402 | .534 | .355 | .395 | 146 |
2018 | 191 | 14 | 31 | .204 | .325 | .370 | .289 | .309 | 93 |
Goldschmidt's strikeout rate as a rookie was 30 percent but has been between 20 and 23 percent each of the previous five seasons, which makes the big jump this season alarming.
SPLIT | PA | OOZ Sw% | Z-Sw% | Sw% | OOZ Ct% | Z-Ct% | Ct% | SwSTR% |
2011 | 177 | 27 | 60 | 41 | 62 | 76 | 71 | 12 |
2012 | 587 | 29 | 64 | 44 | 68 | 82 | 77 | 10 |
2013 | 710 | 25 | 62 | 42 | 69 | 85 | 79 | 8 |
2014 | 479 | 24 | 59 | 39 | 66 | 82 | 76 | 9 |
2015 | 695 | 22 | 62 | 39 | 68 | 83 | 78 | 9 |
2016 | 705 | 23 | 61 | 39 | 70 | 84 | 79 | 8 |
2017 | 665 | 24 | 62 | 41 | 64 | 80 | 75 | 10 |
2018 | 191 | 26 | 62 | 41 | 64 | 76 | 71 | 12 |
Goldschmidt's 2017 plate discipline numbers lineup surprisingly well with what is happening this year, save a few areas. His swinging strikeout rate, overall contact rate, and his contact rate within in the strike zone all harken back to his rookie season performance levels. These rates are not a dramatic drop for him, but noticeable none the less. He is not expanding his zone that much, and even when he is, he is making the same level of out of zone contact in 2018 that he did in 2017. Let's focus on how he has done on pitches within the strike zone the past few seasons. The chart below separates Goldschmidt's wOBA and xwOBA by pitch type; cutters are part of fastballs while splitters are part of offspeed:
SEASON | PITCH | wOBA | xwOBA | DIFF |
2015 | Fastballs | .450 | .442 | .008 |
2016 | Fastballs | .385 | .376 | .009 |
2017 | Fastballs | .478 | .455 | .023 |
2018 | Fastballs | .347 | .454 | -.107 |
2015 | Breaking | .388 | .356 | .032 |
2016 | Breaking | .386 | .357 | .029 |
2017 | Breaking | .294 | .307 | -.013 |
2018 | Breaking | .207 | .325 | -.118 |
2015 | Offspeed | .344 | .309 | .035 |
2016 | Offspeed | .302 | .297 | .005 |
2017 | Offspeed | .652 | .496 | .156 |
2018 | Offspeed | .187 | .216 | -.029 |
He is underperforming his expected outcomes across the board but is having particular trouble with fastballs and breaking balls this year. One thing that stands out with fastballs for him is that he is hitting more fastballs the other way this year than he did last year:
He has frequently used the middle part of the park as well as the pull side throughout his career, but in 2018, he is not pulling as many fastballs save this monster shot off Rich Hill. The immediate thought would be that pitchers are working the fastball more away now that Chase Field is humidified. In reality, there has not been a huge difference in where pitchers are locating their fastballs to Goldschmidt, although more appear to be in the elevated regions of the strike zone in 2018 and he sees fewer fastballs on the inner third:
The other piece of this is the numbers at home off the fastball. He has yet to pull a fastball in the air to left field, and a majority of his fastballs in play are going the other direction. In a humidified Chase Field, those balls are not going to carry as they did in previous seasons:
After slightly overperforming his expected weighted on-base average the past few seasons, he has severely underperformed it thus far in 2018. The important part to remember about xwOBA is that is helps us understand what has happened, but is not a strong predictive measure of what is to come. Sure, if said player continued to make the same type of batted ball contact with the same type of launch angle, and those batted balls went to the same places they are currently going, then xwOBA could predict the future. That does not happen, so it cannot. The larger lesson with this expected stat is that, in theory, Goldschmidt's numbers should be better.
SEASON | wOBA | xwOBA | DIFF |
2015 | .429 | .413 | .016 |
2016 | .382 | .365 | .017 |
2017 | .447 | .435 | .012 |
2018 | .280 | .387 | -.107 |
The original hypothesis here holds up because on the road, Goldschmidt is very much in line with his historical numbers on the road. The strikeout rate issues hold up on the road, but his overall production is outpacing what he did in 2017:
SEASON | PA | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG | ISO | BABIP | wOBA | wRC+ |
2012 | 310 | 9 | 20 | .315 | .377 | .516 | .201 | .367 | .380 | 140 |
2013 | 373 | 12 | 20 | .311 | .395 | .553 | .242 | .351 | .403 | 159 |
2014 | 238 | 13 | 22 | .297 | .387 | .525 | .228 | .359 | .390 | 150 |
2015 | 350 | 13 | 22 | .304 | .391 | .551 | .248 | .346 | .395 | 152 |
2016 | 353 | 17 | 19 | .296 | .416 | .453 | .157 | .355 | .372 | 132 |
2017 | 328 | 11 | 22 | .275 | .363 | .489 | .215 | .313 | .358 | 119 |
2018 | 86 | 7 | 31 | .275 | .326 | .538 | .263 | .354 | .367 | 132 |
The same cannot be said for what he has done at Chase Field in 2018:
SEASON | PA | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG | ISO | BABIP | wOBA | wRC+ |
2012 | 277 | 11 | 25 | .253 | .339 | .461 | .207 | .307 | .344 | 108 |
2013 | 337 | 16 | 21 | .293 | .407 | .550 | .257 | .333 | .405 | 153 |
2014 | 241 | 14 | 24 | .304 | .404 | .559 | .255 | .377 | .414 | 158 |
2015 | 345 | 21 | 21 | .341 | .480 | .591 | .250 | .423 | .441 | 174 |
2016 | 352 | 14 | 23 | .298 | .405 | .524 | .226 | .362 | .391 | 135 |
2017 | 337 | 17 | 22 | .321 | .443 | .639 | .318 | .376 | .442 | 165 |
2018 | 109 | 19 | 31 | .140 | .321 | .209 | .070 | .231 | .259 | 59 |
Again, the strikeout rate is persistent regardless of venue, but his batted ball production is night and day this year, unlike any other season. It is almost like Chase Field has suddenly become the original Forbes Field for Goldschmidt, and he misses him the old run environment. He does not appear to be injured in any way, and this does appear to be something more mental than anything else. Better days should be ahead for him, but once the season ends, we are likely looking at the worst statistical season of Goldschmidt's career, and that is a tough pill to swallow. Misery does love company as he went no lower than 22nd in the 752 NFBC drafts this year, but hopefully, you were not the guy that took him second overall.